Edward Bernays Propaganda

Propaganda, an influential book written by Edward L. Bernays in 1928, incorporated the literature from social science and psychological manipulation into an examination of the techniques of public communication. Bernays wrote the book in response to the success of some of his earlier works such as Crystallizing Public Opinion (1923) and A Public Relations Counsel (1927). Propaganda explored the psychology behind manipulating masses and the ability to use symbolic action and propaganda to influence politics, effect social change, and lobby for gender and racial equality.[1]Walter Lippman was Bernays' unacknowledged American mentor and his work The Phantom Public greatly influenced the ideas expressed in Propaganda a year later.[2] The work propelled Bernays into media historians' view of him as the 'father of public relations.'[3]

  1. Edward Bernays Propaganda Essay
  2. Edward Bernays Propaganda Quotes
  3. Edward Bernays Propaganda Summary
  4. Edward Bernays Propaganda Book
  5. Edward Bernays Propaganda Quotes
  6. Edward Bernays Propaganda Online

Full text of 'Edward Bernays Propaganda Ultimate Collection' See other formats 1/25/2017 File:Propaganda.pdf - Wikispooks File:Propaganda.pdf From Wikispooks y Propaganda.pdf (file size: 355 KB, MIME type: application/pdf) A seminal work on the systematic manipulation of public opinion. Edward Bernays' `Propaganda' offers a valuable insight into how our collective minds function, and the mentality of those who are really pulling the strings in society (the advertisers, big business leaders, as well as prominent politicians) think of us. “Bernays' honest and practical manual provides much insight into some of the most powerful and influential institutions of contemporary industrial state capitalist democracies.”—Noam Chomsky“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society.

Synopsis[edit]

Chapters one through six address the complex relationship between human psychology, democracy, and corporations. Bernays' thesis is that 'invisible' people who create knowledge and propaganda rule over the masses, with a monopoly on the power to shape thoughts, values, and citizen response.[4] 'Engineering consent' of the masses would be vital for the survival of democracy.[5] Bernays explains:

Propaganda

'The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.'[6]

Edward Bernays Propaganda Essay

Bernays expands this argument to the economic realm, appreciating the positive impact of propaganda in the service of capitalism.[7]

'A single factory, potentially capable of supplying a whole continent with its particular product, cannot afford to wait until the public asks for its product; it must maintain constant touch, through advertising and propaganda, with the vast public in order to assure itself the continuous demand which alone will make its costly plant profitable.'[8]

Bernays places great importance on the ability of a propaganda producer, as he views himself, to unlock the motives behind an individual's desires, not simply the reason an individual might offer. He argues, 'Man's thoughts and actions are compensatory substitutes for desires which he has been obliged to suppress.'[9] Bernays suggests that propaganda may become increasingly effective and influential through the discovery of audiences' hidden motives. He asserts that the emotional response inherently present in propaganda limits the audience's choices by creating a binary mentality, which can result in quicker, more enthused responses.[10] The final five chapters largely reiterate the concepts voiced earlier in the book and provide case studies for how to use propaganda to effectively advance women's rights, education, and social services.[11]

Reception and impact[edit]

External video
Discussion of Propaganda with Anne Bernays (daughter of Edward Bernays) and NYU professor Mark Crispin Miller, September 29, 2004, C-SPAN

Despite the relative significance of Propaganda to twentieth century media history and modern public relations, surprisingly little critique of the work exists. Public relations scholar Curt Olsen argues that the public largely accepted Bernays' 'sunny' view of propaganda, an acceptance eroded by fascism in the World War II era.[12] Olsen also argues that Bernays's skill with language allowed terms such as 'education' to subtly replace darker concepts such as 'indoctrination.'[13] Finally, Olsen criticizes Bernays for advocating 'psychic ease' for the average person to have no burden to answer for his or her own actions in the face of powerful messages.[14] On the other hand, writers such as Marvin Olasky justify Bernays as killing democracy in order to save it.[15] In this way, the presence of an elite, faceless persuasion constituted the only plausible way to prevent authoritarian control.[16]

Concepts outlined in Bernays' Propaganda and other works enabled the development of the first 'two-way model' of public relations, using elements of social science in order to better formulate public opinion.[17] Bernays justified public relations as a profession by clearly emphasizing that no individual or group had a monopoly on the true understanding of the world.[18] According to public relations expert Stuart Ewen, 'What Lippman set out in grand, overview terms, Bernays is running through in how-to-do-it-terms.'[19] His techniques are now staples for public image creation and political campaigns.[20]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^Bernays
  2. ^Stephen Bender, LewRockwell.com, 'Karl Rove & the Spectre of Freud's Nephew.' Last modified 2005. Accessed March 26, 2013. http://archive.lewrockwell.com/orig6/bender2.html.
  3. ^Turow, 565.
  4. ^Bernays, 20.
  5. ^Bernays, 11.
  6. ^Bernays, 9.
  7. ^Bernays, 61.
  8. ^Bernays, 57.
  9. ^Bernays, 52.
  10. ^Bernays, 28, 100.
  11. ^Bernays.
  12. ^Olsen.
  13. ^Olsen.
  14. ^Olsen.
  15. ^Olasky
  16. ^Olasky
  17. ^Turow, 565.
  18. ^Turow, 565.
  19. ^Tye, 98.
  20. ^Tye, ix.

Sources[edit]

  • Edward Bernays (1928). Propaganda. Routledge.
  • Marvin Olasky (1984). 'Roots of Modern Public Relations: The Bernays Doctrine.' Public Relations Quarterly.
  • Curt Olsen (July 2005). 'Bernay vs. Ellul: Two views of propaganda'. Public Relations Tactics 12(7), p. 28.
  • Joseph Turow (2011). Media Today: An Introduction to Mass Communication. New York, New York: Routledge.
  • Larry Tye (2002). The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays and The Birth of Public Relations. Picador.
  • Propaganda (1928), Edward Bernays (catalog record on HathiTrust Digital Library)

External links[edit]

  • Stephen Bender. Karl Rove & the Spectre of Freud's Nephew, LewRockwell.com, 2005-02-04

Edward Bernays Propaganda Quotes

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Propaganda_(book)&oldid=1021488328'

Propaganda, an influential book written by Edward L. Bernays in 1928, incorporated the literature from social science and psychological manipulation into an examination of the techniques of public communication. Bernays wrote the book in response to the success of some of his earlier works such as Crystallizing Public Opinion (1923) and A Public Relations Counsel (1927). Propaganda explored the psychology behind manipulating masses and the ability to use symbolic action and propaganda to influence politics, effect social change, and lobby for gender and racial equality.[1]Walter Lippman was Bernays' unacknowledged American mentor and his work The Phantom Public greatly influenced the ideas expressed in Propaganda a year later.[2] The work propelled Bernays into media historians' view of him as the 'father of public relations.'[3]

Synopsis[edit]

Chapters one through six address the complex relationship between human psychology, democracy, and corporations. Bernays' thesis is that 'invisible' people who create knowledge and propaganda rule over the masses, with a monopoly on the power to shape thoughts, values, and citizen response.[4] 'Engineering consent' of the masses would be vital for the survival of democracy.[5] Bernays explains:

'The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.'[6]

Bernays expands this argument to the economic realm, appreciating the positive impact of propaganda in the service of capitalism.[7]

'A single factory, potentially capable of supplying a whole continent with its particular product, cannot afford to wait until the public asks for its product; it must maintain constant touch, through advertising and propaganda, with the vast public in order to assure itself the continuous demand which alone will make its costly plant profitable.'[8]

Bernays places great importance on the ability of a propaganda producer, as he views himself, to unlock the motives behind an individual's desires, not simply the reason an individual might offer. He argues, 'Man's thoughts and actions are compensatory substitutes for desires which he has been obliged to suppress.'[9] Bernays suggests that propaganda may become increasingly effective and influential through the discovery of audiences' hidden motives. He asserts that the emotional response inherently present in propaganda limits the audience's choices by creating a binary mentality, which can result in quicker, more enthused responses.[10] The final five chapters largely reiterate the concepts voiced earlier in the book and provide case studies for how to use propaganda to effectively advance women's rights, education, and social services.[11]

Reception and impact[edit]

Edward Bernays Propaganda Summary

External video
Discussion of Propaganda with Anne Bernays (daughter of Edward Bernays) and NYU professor Mark Crispin Miller, September 29, 2004, C-SPAN

Despite the relative significance of Propaganda to twentieth century media history and modern public relations, surprisingly little critique of the work exists. Public relations scholar Curt Olsen argues that the public largely accepted Bernays' 'sunny' view of propaganda, an acceptance eroded by fascism in the World War II era.[12] Olsen also argues that Bernays's skill with language allowed terms such as 'education' to subtly replace darker concepts such as 'indoctrination.'[13] Finally, Olsen criticizes Bernays for advocating 'psychic ease' for the average person to have no burden to answer for his or her own actions in the face of powerful messages.[14] On the other hand, writers such as Marvin Olasky justify Bernays as killing democracy in order to save it.[15] In this way, the presence of an elite, faceless persuasion constituted the only plausible way to prevent authoritarian control.[16]

Concepts outlined in Bernays' Propaganda and other works enabled the development of the first 'two-way model' of public relations, using elements of social science in order to better formulate public opinion.[17] Bernays justified public relations as a profession by clearly emphasizing that no individual or group had a monopoly on the true understanding of the world.[18] According to public relations expert Stuart Ewen, 'What Lippman set out in grand, overview terms, Bernays is running through in how-to-do-it-terms.'[19] His techniques are now staples for public image creation and political campaigns.[20]

Edward Bernays Propaganda Book

Notes[edit]

  1. ^Bernays
  2. ^Stephen Bender, LewRockwell.com, 'Karl Rove & the Spectre of Freud's Nephew.' Last modified 2005. Accessed March 26, 2013. http://archive.lewrockwell.com/orig6/bender2.html.
  3. ^Turow, 565.
  4. ^Bernays, 20.
  5. ^Bernays, 11.
  6. ^Bernays, 9.
  7. ^Bernays, 61.
  8. ^Bernays, 57.
  9. ^Bernays, 52.
  10. ^Bernays, 28, 100.
  11. ^Bernays.
  12. ^Olsen.
  13. ^Olsen.
  14. ^Olsen.
  15. ^Olasky
  16. ^Olasky
  17. ^Turow, 565.
  18. ^Turow, 565.
  19. ^Tye, 98.
  20. ^Tye, ix.

Edward Bernays Propaganda Quotes

Sources[edit]

Edward Bernays Propaganda Online

  • Edward Bernays (1928). Propaganda. Routledge.
  • Marvin Olasky (1984). 'Roots of Modern Public Relations: The Bernays Doctrine.' Public Relations Quarterly.
  • Curt Olsen (July 2005). 'Bernay vs. Ellul: Two views of propaganda'. Public Relations Tactics 12(7), p. 28.
  • Joseph Turow (2011). Media Today: An Introduction to Mass Communication. New York, New York: Routledge.
  • Larry Tye (2002). The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays and The Birth of Public Relations. Picador.
  • Propaganda (1928), Edward Bernays (catalog record on HathiTrust Digital Library)

External links[edit]

  • Stephen Bender. Karl Rove & the Spectre of Freud's Nephew, LewRockwell.com, 2005-02-04
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Propaganda_(book)&oldid=1021488328'